Unseen Chaos: How Too Many Communication Tools Disrupt Healthcare Efficiency
In the fast-paced environment of modern healthcare, effective communication isn’t just beneficial—it’s essential. But while technological advancements have made healthcare communication tools more accessible, they’ve also made it more complex. Healthcare providers are often required to juggle multiple platforms pagers, emails, messaging apps, and electronic health record (EHR) notifications. Rather than streamlining workflows, this mix of tools can create confusion, delay response times, and disrupt the continuity of care. When every second counts, the chaos caused by navigating multiple communication methods can lead to frustration, errors, and, ultimately, poorer patient outcomes.
Communication Overload: A Growing Problem in Healthcare
A recent survey by TigerConnect, in partnership with Becker’s Healthcare, highlights the impact of communication inefficiencies in healthcare settings. The survey, which included professionals across various care delivery roles, identified several types of “communication noise“—issues that disrupt or delay vital exchanges of information.
The most common problem? Switching between different communication systems. A staggering 86% of clinicians reported that they have to switch tools at least occasionally during a shift, and 54% said it happens frequently. This constant shifting from one platform to another is not just inconvenient—it’s the top barrier to effective communication in hospitals, affecting care coordination, patient satisfaction, and patient safety.
Too Many Tools, Too Little Efficiency
Survey respondents listed a wide range of healthcare communication tools used in their hospitals, from modern platforms to outdated systems like pagers. The problem? These tools don’t always integrate, leading to delays and communication breakdowns. For instance, tools like email, pagers, and phone calls are not only slow but also lack delivery transparency, leaving senders unsure if their messages have been received or acknowledged.
Multiple tools force healthcare professionals to log in and out of different systems, diverting their focus away from patient care. This “switching cost” not only wastes time but also introduces opportunities for errors, miscommunication, and missed connections—none of which are acceptable when time is critical.
Standardize to Optimize: The Case for a Unified Communication Platform
The solution to this growing problem is simpler than you might think: Standardize communication across a single, integrated platform like TigerConnect. By consolidating communication into one system, healthcare providers can streamline workflows, eliminate the need for constant tool-switching, and significantly reduce the risk of communication errors.
Take Tufts Medical Center, for example. After adopting TigerConnect as their default communication platform, they saw a 70% improvement in on-time first-case operating room starts. Their ED consult times also improved, along with faster confirmation of radiology alerts, resulting in better, faster patient care.
TigerConnect integrates with major EHR systems, scheduling software, and other tools, enabling seamless communication across departments and providers. This level of integration not only improves care delivery but also boosts staff satisfaction and hospital performance.
Eliminate the Hidden Costs of Poor Communication
Communication is the lifeblood of healthcare. Yet, when too many systems are in play, it creates unnecessary complexity and costs—not just in terms of wasted time, but in reduced care quality, increased staff burnout, and compromised patient outcomes. By adopting a unified communication platform like TigerConnect, healthcare providers can eliminate these hidden costs, enabling staff to focus on what truly matters: delivering high-quality patient care.
Featured Resources
Related Articles
State of Healthcare Collaboration: How Communication Inefficiencies Impact Clinician Productivity
Discover what healthcare professionals have to say about communication inefficiencies.